The A+ Setup: How We Grade Every Trade Before Entry
Here's a confession: I used to take every setup that looked "pretty good."
Support level? Trade it. Decent pattern? Trade it. Gut feeling? Trade it.
My results were mediocre at best. Some wins, some losses, no consistency.
Then I developed a grading system. I started rating every potential trade from D to A+. And I made one simple rule: only trade A+ setups.
Everything changed.
My win rate went up. My average win size increased. My stress went down. I was taking fewer trades but making more money.
This is the Tim Warren Method—and I'm going to break down exactly how it works.
Why Grade Your Trades?
Most traders take too many trades. They see something that could work and jump in.
The problem? "Could work" isn't good enough.
Think about it like baseball. You don't swing at every pitch. You wait for the pitch you can crush. The more selective you are, the higher your batting average.
Trading is the same. The market throws hundreds of potential setups at you every week. Your job isn't to trade all of them—it's to identify the few that have the highest probability of success.
Grading forces you to be selective. It creates a framework for saying "no" to mediocre setups.
The Grade Scale
Here's how I categorize setups:
A+ Grade: All confirmations aligned. Perfect setup. Take it with conviction.
A Grade: Strong setup with 7+ confirmations. Very tradeable.
B Grade: Decent setup with some confirmations. Tradeable for experienced traders.
C Grade: Marginal setup. More uncertainty than conviction. Skip it.
D Grade: Poor setup. Missing critical elements. Hard pass.
F Grade: Everything wrong. Taking this trade would be gambling.
Our trading signals only broadcast A+ setups. We don't alert members to B or C grade opportunities. Why? Because those trades don't consistently make money over time.
The 10 Confirmations
For a setup to earn an A+ grade, it needs to check multiple boxes. Here are the confirmations I look for:
1. Major Support or Resistance Level
Is price at a significant level that has caused reactions before?
Not a minor level. Not a level you had to squint to see. A major, obvious level where other traders are clearly watching.
If the setup isn't at a key level, it automatically loses a grade.
2. Multiple Timeframe Alignment
Does the setup look good on higher timeframes too?
If I'm taking a trade on the 4-hour chart, I want the daily and weekly to support my thesis. If the 4-hour looks bullish but the daily looks bearish, that's a conflict.
The best trades have all timeframes pointing the same direction.
3. Trend Alignment
Am I trading with the trend or against it?
Trading with the trend is playing on easy mode. Support holds better in uptrends. Resistance breaks more easily in uptrends.
Counter-trend trades can work, but they need extra confirmations to compensate.
4. Candlestick Pattern
Is there a clear reversal or continuation pattern at the level?
Bullish engulfing at support. Shooting star at resistance. Morning star after a pullback. These patterns show that other traders are reacting to the level too.
5. Volume Confirmation
Is volume supporting the move?
High volume on reversal candles shows conviction. Low volume breakouts are often false.
I want to see volume agree with price action.
6. Risk/Reward Ratio
Does the setup offer at least 1:3 risk/reward?
If I'm risking $100, I want a clear path to $300+ profit. If the next resistance is only 1:1 away, the trade doesn't justify the risk.
Poor R:R downgrades any setup, no matter how good it looks.
Learn more about risk/reward ratios and why they matter.
7. Clear Invalidation Point
Do I know exactly where I'm wrong?
Every A+ setup has a clear stop loss level. If I can't define where the trade is invalidated, I can't properly size the position or manage risk.
Vague setups get vague results.
8. Clean Chart Structure
Is the chart easy to read, or is it choppy and messy?
Clean trends, clear levels, and obvious patterns are easier to trade than messy, consolidating markets.
If I'm unsure what I'm looking at, that's not an A+ setup.
9. News/Event Awareness
Are there any upcoming events that could invalidate the technical setup?
Earnings announcements, Fed meetings, economic data releases—these can overwhelm technical analysis.
I either wait for the event to pass or account for the additional risk.
10. Conviction Level
Do I actually believe in this trade?
This sounds subjective, but it matters. After years of trading, you develop intuition. When everything aligns but something feels off, that's your subconscious noticing something your conscious mind missed.
I don't take trades that don't feel right, even if they check the boxes.
How to Grade: A Practical Example
Let me walk through a real grading process:
Scenario: Bitcoin has pulled back to $45,000 after a run-up. I'm considering a long position.
Grading checklist:
- ✅ Support level: $45,000 was resistance turned support, tested twice before
- ✅ Multiple timeframes: Daily trend is up, weekly trend is up, 4H shows higher low
- ✅ Trend alignment: With the trend (bullish)
- ✅ Candlestick pattern: Bullish engulfing forming on 4H
- ✅ Volume: Volume spike on the bounce, showing buyers stepping in
- ✅ Risk/reward: Stop at $43,500, target $51,000 = 1:4 ratio
- ✅ Clear invalidation: Below $43,500 and the thesis is dead
- ✅ Clean structure: Clear uptrend with obvious support levels
- ✅ News: No major news this week
- ✅ Conviction: I believe in this trade
Grade: A+
This setup has 10/10 confirmations. I'm taking this trade with full position size.
Now imagine the same scenario, but: - The daily chart shows a potential bearish pattern forming - Volume on the bounce is low - There's a Fed meeting tomorrow
Now it's maybe a B or C grade. I skip it or take half position.
This is how the grading system forces discipline.
Why We Only Trade A+ Setups
The math speaks for itself.
When you take every B, C, and D grade setup that comes along, your win rate suffers. You're fighting against probability instead of stacking it in your favor.
When you only take A+ setups: - Win rate increases (you're choosing the best opportunities) - Average win increases (A+ setups trend further because they have momentum) - Average loss decreases (invalidation points are clearer) - Trading stress decreases (you have conviction in every trade) - Total trade count decreases (but quality > quantity)
This is why our signals bot has the track record it does. We're not trading constantly—we're waiting for the perfect pitch.
The Hardest Part: Patience
I'm not going to lie—waiting for A+ setups is hard.
You'll see B and C setups tempting you. "It could work. I'm bored. Let me just take this one."
Don't.
The discipline to wait is what separates profitable traders from break-even traders. Every time you take a subpar setup, you're diluting your edge.
In our community, we hold each other accountable. Members share setups and we collectively grade them. This peer review process catches mediocre setups before they become losing trades.
Building Your Own Grading System
While I've shared my 10 confirmations, your system might be slightly different. That's fine.
The key principles are:
- Define your criteria clearly: What specifically do you need to see?
- Be specific, not vague: "Looks good" isn't a criterion
- Require multiple confirmations: One factor isn't enough
- Grade consistently: Every potential trade gets graded the same way
- Trust the grade: If it's not A+, don't take it
Want the complete system? The Trade Grading System course breaks down every confirmation in detail, with real chart examples.
The A+ Lifestyle
Here's something unexpected that happened when I committed to A+ only trading:
I got my life back.
I'm not glued to charts 16 hours a day anymore. I check for setups, grade them, and either take them or walk away. When I'm in a trade, I have conviction—so I'm not anxiety-checking my phone constantly.
This methodology isn't just more profitable. It's more sustainable.
Trading should enhance your life, not consume it. When you're only taking the best setups, you can actually enjoy the rest of your time.
Start Grading Today
Here's your assignment:
- Pull up your last 10 trades
- Grade each one honestly using the criteria above
- Calculate your win rate on A+ setups vs. everything else
- Notice the pattern
I guarantee you'll find that your A+ trades performed better than your B/C/D trades.
That's not an accident. That's the power of being selective.
Stop trading everything. Start grading everything. Only trade the best.
That's the Tim Warren Method.
This is educational content. Trading involves risk. Past results do not guarantee future performance. Always do your own research.
This is educational content only. Trading involves significant risk. Never trade with money you can't afford to lose.